Search This Blog

Monday, August 22, 2011

Brittish Riots: A Startling Preview of a South Africa under Julius Malema

This Was taken from The Yahoo News Article
 
LONDON (AP) — Thousands of extra police officers flooded into London Wednesday in a bid to end Britain's worst rioting in a generation. An eerie calm prevailed in the capital, but unrest spread across England on a fourth night of violence driven by diverse and brazen crowds of young people.
Scenes of ransacked stores, torched cars and blackened buildings frightened and outraged Britons just a year before their country is to host next summer's Olympic Games, bringing demands for a tougher response from law enforcement. Police across the country have made more than 1,100 arrests since the violence broke out over the weekend.
In London, where armored vehicles and convoys of police vans patrolled the streets, authorities said there would be 16,000 officers on duty — almost triple the number present Monday. They said a large presence would remain in the city through the next 24 hours at least.
The show of force seems to have worked.
"Without wishing to speak too soon it's been reasonably quiet for us so far tonight," London's Fire Brigade said in a message posted to Twitter earlier in the evening. "Let's hope it stays that way."
But outside the capital, chaos was spreading.
In the northwestern city of Manchester, hundreds of youths — some looking as young as 10 — rampaged through the city center, hurling bottles and stones at police and vandalizing stores. A women's clothing store on the city's main shopping street was set ablaze, along with a disused library in nearby Salford.
Manchester's assistant chief constable Garry Shewan said looting and arson had taken place there on an unprecedented scale.
"We want to make it absolutely clear — they have nothing to protest against," he said. "There is nothing in a sense of injustice and there has been no spark that has led to this."
Britain's riots began Saturday when an initially peaceful protest over a police shooting in London's Tottenham neighborhood turned violent. That clash has morphed into a general lawlessness in London and several other cities that police have struggled to halt.
While the rioters have run off with sneakers, bikes, electronics and leather goods, they also have torched stores apparently just for the fun of seeing something burn. They were left virtually unchallenged in several neighborhoods, and when police did arrive they often were able to flee quickly and regroup.
With police struggling to control the violence, some residents stood guard to protect their neighborhoods. Outside a Sikh temple in Southall, west London, residents vowed to defend their place of worship if mobs of young rioters appeared. Another group marched through Enfield, in north London, aiming to deter looters.
In a potentially troublesome development, one far-right group said about 1,000 of its members around the country were taking to the streets to deter rioters.
"We're going to stop the riots — police obviously can't handle it," Stephen Lennon, leader of the far-right English Defense League, told The Associated Press. He warned that he couldn't guarantee there wouldn't be violent clashes with rioting youths.
Anders Behring Breivik, who has confessed to the bombing and massacre that killed 77 people in Norway last month, has cited the EDL as an inspiration.
Meanwhile virtually every major city in England was seeing some form of unrest.
In the central England city of Nottingham, police said rioters hurled firebombs though the window of a police station, and set fire to a school and a vehicle outside a second police station — but there were no reports of injuries. A total of 90 people were arrested in attacks on stores, a college, a community center and cars.
Some 250 people were arrested after two days of violence in Birmingham — where police launched a murder investigation after the deaths of three men who were hit by a car. It wasn't immediately clear if the deaths were linked to the rioting. Police are also looking into unconfirmed reports of shots fired in a restive inner-city neighborhood.
In the northern city of Liverpool, about 200 youths hurled missiles at police and firefighters in a second night of unrest, and the area's police force reported 44 arrests.
There also were minor clashes for the first time in the central and western England locations of Leicester, Wolverhampton, West Bromwich, Bristol, and Gloucester — where police and firefighters tackled a blaze and disturbance in the city's Brunswick district.
In London, stores, offices and nursery schools had closed early Tuesday evening amid fears of fresh rioting. Several usually busy streets were quiet as some cafes, restaurants and pubs also decided to shut down for the night.
Many shops had their metal blinds pulled down, while other business owners rushed to secure plywood over their windows before nightfall.
In east London's Bethnal Green district, convenience store owner Adnan Butt, 28, said the situation was still tense.
"People are all at home — they're scared," he said.
Senior officers said they were considering the possible use of plastic bullets — blunt-nosed projectiles designed to deal punishing blows to rioters without penetrating the skin. Such weapons, formally called baton rounds, still are used to quell riots in Northern Ireland but have never been used by police on Britain's mainland.
Prime Minister David Cameron's government rejected calls by Conservative lawmaker Patrick Mercer and some members of the public for strong-arm riot measures that British police generally avoid, such as tear gas and water cannons.
"They should have the tools available and they should use them if the commander on the ground thinks it's necessary," Mercer said.
The disorder has caused heartache for Londoners whose businesses and homes were torched or ransacked, and a crisis for police and politicians already staggering from a sputtering economy and a scandal over illegal phone hacking by a tabloid newspaper that has dragged in senior politicians and police.
"The public wanted to see tough action. They wanted to see it sooner and there is a degree of frustration," said Andrew Silke, head of the criminology department at the University of East London.
So far 768 people have been arrested in London and 167 charged — including an 11-year-old boy — and the capital's prison cells were overflowing. Britain's Crown Prosecution Service said it had teams of lawyers working 24 hours a day to help police decide whether to charge suspects, allowing them to quickly clear police station cells.
A total of 111 officers and 14 members of the public have been hurt so far in the rioting, including a man in his 60s who was attacked as he attempted to put out a fire started by members of a mob.
Police said the injured man had been tackling a blaze in a garbage bin, when he was set upon by several rioters. "It was quite a grave assault and his condition is causing us some concern," said police commander Simon Foy.
The unrest has been Britain's worst since race riots set London ablaze in the 1980s.
A soccer match scheduled for Wednesday between England and the Netherlands at London's Wembley stadium was canceled to free up police officers for riot duty. Britain's soccer authorities said they were in talks with police to see whether this weekend's season-opening matches of the Premier League could still go ahead in London.
Prime Minister David Cameron cut short a holiday in Italy to deal with the crisis, reversing an earlier decision to remain on his vacation. He recalled Parliament from its summer recess for an emergency debate on the riots Thursday.
Cameron described the scenes of burning buildings and smashed windows as "sickening," but refrained from tougher measures such as calling in the military to help restore order.
"People should be in no doubt that we will do everything necessary to restore order to Britain's streets and to make them safe for the law-abiding," Cameron told reporters after a crisis meeting at his Downing Street office.
Other politicians visited riot sites Tuesday — but for many residents it was too little, too late.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg was booed by crowds who shouted "Go home!" in Birmingham, while London Mayor Boris Johnson — who flew back overnight from his summer vacation — was heckled on a shattered shopping street in Clapham, south London.
Johnson said the riots would not stop London from "welcoming the world to our city" for the Olympics.
"We have time in the next 12 months to rebuild, to repair the damage that has been done," he said. "I'm not saying it will be done overnight, but this is what we are going to do."
The violence had its genesis in the fatal police shooting of Mark Duggan, a 29-year-old father of four who was gunned down in Tottenham on Thursday under disputed circumstances.
Police said Duggan was shot dead when officers from Operation Trident — the unit that investigates gun crime in the black community — stopped a cab he was riding in. A protest demanding justice on Saturday devolved into a riot, which spread to neighboring parts of London on Sunday and by Monday had spread across the capital.
Duggan's death resonated in part because it stirred memories of the 1980s, when many black Londoners felt they were disproportionately stopped and searched by police. Their frustration erupted in violent riots in 1985.
But the rioters who've taken to the streets since Sunday have been extremely diverse — those in central England appeared to be mostly white and working class.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission, which is investigating Duggan's shooting, said a "non-police firearm" was recovered at the scene, but that there was no evidence it had been fired, or that Duggan had fired a weapon at police. An inquest into Duggan's death was opened Tuesday, but a full hearing will likely take several months.
Seeking explanations for the unrest, some pointed to rising social tensions in Britain as the government slashes 80 billion pounds ($130 billion) from public spending by 2015 to reduce the country's huge budget deficit, swollen after the country spent billions bailing out its foundering banks.
But many rioters appeared simply to relish the opportunity for unchecked violence Monday night. "Come join the fun!" shouted one youth as looters hit the east London suburb of Hackney.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The scenes of graphic violence and chaos across Britain's Major Cities is a chilling reminder of what can happen, even in a country that is reknowned for its civilized society and reserved nature... All of which started from an alleged racial attack on a Black British citizen by Police Officers. However, the ensuing riots and mindless destruction of private and public property is a stark reminder that social tensions can explode into an orgy of bloodletting and internal carnage that is reminiscent of areas of Iraq and Aghanistan!

And, though the looting is fueled by brazen criminals, this is definately linked to the events of the pro-democracy uprisings in the Middle-East and North Africa, as there seems to be a wave of rebellion going around the World like a political tsunami leaving devastation in its wake the likes of which haven't been seen since the End of Slavery.

What does it mean for South Africa, a nation foundering in social injustice and retributive racial politics? What are the potential hazards for South Africa if we don't stop all of the political gerrymandering and backstabbing? Are we also likely to face the same scenes of wanton destruction?

Yes... We do have a lot to be worried about, because thesame incidents happen everyday in South Africa and yet, we have not had to rampant chaos and anarchy in the city streets that England is experiencing at the moment. Yes... There definately is a lot of crime and curruption going on (at an endemic level of morally bankruptness), but we do not have riots going on in the streets and general lawlessness.

What we do have is an undercurrent of black-on-white emnity that is threatening to boil over, because the majority of the African demographic population of South Africa is tired of waiting for their slice of the proverbial pie and don't understand that their leaders in the ANC Government have stolen this slice away from them through directing BEE companies that should be paying out to the average African person. Instead, the African's hostility is directed towards the "White People, who stole the country away from us and should be treated like criminals" to paraphrase Julius Malema (ANCYL President), who recently, was quoted as having verbally encourgaed the african people of Botswana to rise up and overthrow their government.

What we're dealing with is a ground-swell of misinformed and exploited South African people (+-30 million), who are being lead around by the ear by unscrupulous demagogue leaders hellbent on self-enrichment. The ANC (main body) is riddled with corruption, even in the upper echelon and the ANC Youth League is little better than an out-of-control internal terror squad of the main body headed up by Julius Malema. This is the same man, who advised the people of Botswana to remove their country's regime and who has said that "All White People are criminals and should be treated as Criminals"... This is also the same man, who lionises Robert Mugabe and copies his speech rhetoric.

How much longer is this man, Julius Malema, going to be allowed to play with Political matches in the gunpowder-store before the ANC and the South African Citizens realise that we can not afford to let a psychotic  meglomaniac play games with our lives! He most definately is not in it for altruistic reasons, as the media has exposed his motives involving tender-corruption through his Ratanang Family Trust...

Monday, August 8, 2011

African Democracy & South African Politics



Much has been said about South Africa's foreign policies towards other Southern African countries...
But the ANC's behavior towards Zimbabwe & Swaziland reveals their level of commitment to the democratic rights of African people.

In a country  with such a pathologically corrupt king (Mswati III), how does the South African Political Leadership think that throwing a humungous pile of money at the despotic King will help save Swaziland from total economic chaos? It's the equivalent of trying to put out a neighborhood of burning houses by dumping planeloads of jet-fuel on to the fire.... Not very good for the well-being of anyone! And does the ANC leadership think that King Mswati III will be any more honest than Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe? Surely not!

They don't hold themselves or other African leaders accountable to uphold the democratic rights of their citizens. They actively turn a blind eye & even bail-out leaders no matter how atrocious their behaviour is! And their keeness to have the Information Act passed through the South African Legislature is a glaring red warning light that the ANC wants to create the same environment were they can do the same things and behave in the same way...

However, their citizens & the rest of the world can't afford to let yet another Southern African country slide inexoribly into anarchy and chaos, because when the refugees start arriving on their doorsteps, then they are not going to be able to turn a blind-eye!

Otherwise we might as well get out the marshmallows and find a LONG stick to toast the mallows on from a safe distance!

The Zimbabwean Refugee Situation & Human Rights Complaints

In response to Special Assignment on the 3rd of August. There are a few facts about the Zimbabwean refugees in SA that have to be understood:

1. Sa is the only country that allows foreigners to move freely and unrestricted inside its borders.          2. The SA borders are ridiculously insecure and are largely unpatrolled. 3. The right to housing, basic services & being fed does not include freedom of movement.

Other countries actually hold illegal immigrants in detention centers until their status has been formally identified. Only refugees fleeing political persecution, civil war or famine are given asylum.
The Zimbabwean immigrants are economic not political and therefore should have to get visas before entering South Africa, just like any other person anywhere else in the world. If they want asylum, as refugees, they will have to prove that they will be persecuted if they return to Zimbabwe.

The fact that the Zimbabweans complain about their treatment by Home Affairs & the South African Police is hypocritical, as they are doing nothing to remove Robert Mugabe from power or stop the attacks by ZANU-PF War Veterans on their fellow citizens.

The problem with having such a large immigrant population is that it puts a tremendous strain on the South African economy. We already have to deal with 25-50% unemployment in SA, which means that we do not have enough jobs for our own citizens.




While one can understand their complaints about xenophobic attacks on them and other foreigners by South Africans. This is not something that was totally unforseen, as whereever a large concentration of refugees or economic migrants has happened there has been violent attacks on these foreigners: Kenya, Tanzania, Sudan, Chad, Angola, Mozambique, Malawi, Namibia, Botswana, Sawziland, Nigeria, Eritrea, Somalia, Algeria, Egypt and Zimbabwe - So why should a sudden massive influx of foreigners (refugees or immigrants) cause anything different in South Africa? We are a normal Flawed country just like any other...

The solution to the problem of the Zimbabwean illegal immigrants is to get an AU Force to enforce the last election results, which the MDC actually won... And that means that the ANC Government in SA has to stop sucking up to Robert Mugabe!

However, there is no way that SA can allow itself to become a dump-ground for Africa's disadvantaged. Particularly, as none of the other countries in Africa want to take them...

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

The Decline of the ANC through Internal Conflict & Irrelevance

The one thing that is getting more obvious as the years go by is that the ANC is fast losing relevance for many African people in South Africa, as they are being seen as a completely nepotistic and corrupt party that has lost all interest and impetus in carrying on the political aspirations of the ANC Founders.

This has become blatantly obvious through the ANC heirarchy becoming offensively Individualistic in their self-serving goals of self-enrichment and corrupt hegemonic bureacracy. The heirarchy can not even seem to agree on important issues anymore, as evidenced by the recent Jimmy Manye and Julius Malema incidents. Even the original tripartite alliance members: Cosatu & the Communist Party do not accept the actions and policies of the ANC, ahich is hopefully a welcome sign that there is hope for South Africa in the future.

With the recent Nationalisation Debate and the Ongoing Leadership Battle for the succession of power from Jacob Zuma to all of the upwordly ambitious junior leaders within the party, one can only wonder how long it will take for the ANC to lose power and be replaced by another party that wants to serve the people of this country (not just themselves)...

One has only to hear about the recent and very public inditements against Sheryl Cwele (Convicted Drug Smuggler) or Bheki Cele (Corrupt Police Commissioner involved in real estate tender scandal) or Julius Malema's Ratananga Trust Fund Scandal to realise that the rotten apple does not fall that far away from the tree trunk. Bare in mind that just after 1995 there was the widely condemned R249 Billion Arms Deal between the South African Government and several European Arms Manufacturers, which had the support and tacit agreement of nearly everyone of the top ANC Cabinet and Parliament Ministers. There has already been confirmation of the involvement of Tony Yengeni (new suv), Shabir Shaik (financial incentives), Thabo Mbheki (new shoes with help from former police commissioner and airplane) and Jacob Zuma (financial incentives and other million rand payoffs).

So when will the hammer fall? In the next ten to fifteen years, after the last of the struggle veteran leaders has served their time as president of South Africa. The sad thing is that the New South Africa will pass away into history in a shorter time period than what the Apartheid government took (26 to 30 years, as oppsed to 48 years)... And the South African people, especially the previously disadvantaged and currently explioted, will be in an even worse economic political position than what they were under Apartheid... Sad, but it makes you think doesn't it...